Can a thought be an algorithm?
Shreyas Prakash
When you actively hold a question in your mind, you start seeing potential answers and questions related to it pop up in your radar. The question and the answer co-evolve in a gracious dance enriching our understanding of the world and space around us. Questions act as your personal radar.
The textbook definition of a question is a sentence used to seek information. But it feels borderline criminal to reduce something as foundational as a question to something…transactional. We think in questions. If knowledge is a complex web inside the mind, each node is a question, and each connecting line the information you’ve picked up on the journey from node to node. The pursuit of knowledge is the accumulation of questions. They shape our identity as much by being asked as by being answered.
Sindhu https://www.readkindredspirits.com/p/questions-are-desire-paths-of-curiosity
As Sindhu argues in her blog, a question is not merely a phrase used to seek information (and its borderline criminal to reduce it to such).
There’s an under-appreciated beauty in formulating a “good” question. What we ask, and how we ask it, determines what we’ll discover. People often think about asking questions in ways that make sure the other person will have no choice but to answer it. But it’s nice to think about the practice of formulating questions as an art form in itself. Coming up with questions is also an act of creation. Understanding and honing the way you inquire about the world can be as active as getting answers to those inquiries.
Questions are great pickaxes. And when done right, it’s an art form of its own. The more “impossible” the question is, the more profound the answers are. A problem “well put” is half-solved.
The more absurd, the more “impossible” the question, the more profound the answers.
Take, for instance, a question that investor Peter Thiel likes to ask himself and others: “If you have a 10-year plan of how to get [somewhere], you should ask: Why can’t you do this in 6… https://t.co/mY9A7az5ea
— Tim Ferriss (@tferriss) October 17, 2023
Conscious thinking is largely asking and answering questions in our own head. I’ve been recently obsessed with making these internal thought processes more refined after coming across this idea of ‘algorithms of thought’ (AoTs) — a special class of algorithms that can range from simple sequence of pre-defined steps to complex, branching questionnaires. In other words, can a thought be an algorithm?
Although there is a collective benefit of drafting better algorithms of thought, I had done this primarily as a selfish objective: to help think more clearly and make better decisions.
It’s also not something which is recent and hipster. They have been around for centuries as a concept. Ranging from the storefront fortune-telling scam artist, to the Tarot and I-Ching, they’ve all been algorithms of thought in one way or the other. Questions that guide user to consider their own experiences in radically different perspectives, based on meanings assigned to randomly-selected cards or hexagrams.
From my perspective, algorithms of thought been around for centuries, encoded as meditative practices, rituals, scriptures, divinatory practices, theory manuals, apps, and workshops. One might even argue that certain compounds (DMT, LSD, psilocybin), given their ability to catalyze shifts in consciousness that, in turn, lead to durable, life-changing perceptions of the self and its place in the world, are algorithms of thought in chemical form.
Mark McElroy https://markmcelroy.com/a-metaphysican-looks-at-algorithms-of-thought/
These are some of my own AoTs I use on a day to day basis across various situations in life. Feel free to remix or rehash them as you see fit.
When I want to provide constructive criticism
I use this template to organise my feedback. If I want to quickly scan and drop suggestions, I use the ABCD framework below:
- What’s amazing?
- What’s boring?
- What’s confusing?
- What didn’t you believe?
Whenever I’m brainstorming ideas
SCAMPER is a great technique to quickly come up with various ideas in a short time. The list might be exhaustive, and I usually don’t go through the entire list all the time.
Substitue
- What can I substitute so as to make an improvement?
- How can I substitute the place, time, materials or people?
- Can I substitute one part for another or change any parts?
- Can I replace someone involved?
- Can I change the rules?
- Should I change the name?
- Can I use other ingredients or materials?
- Can I use other processes or procedures?
- Can I change its shape, colour, roughness, sound or smell?
- Can I use this idea for other projects?
- Can I change my feelings or attitude towards it?
Combine
- What ideas, materials, features, processes, people, products, or components can I combine?
- Can I combine or merge this or that with other objects?
- What can I combine so as to maximize the number of uses?
- What can I combine in order to lower the costs of production?
- Which materials could I combine?
- Where can I build synergy?
- Which are the best elements I can bring together so as to achieve a particular result?
Adapt
- Which part of the product could I change?
- Could I change the characteristics of a component?
- Can I seek inspiration in other products or processes, but in a different context?
- Does the history offer any solutions?
- Which ideas could I adapt, copy, or borrow from other people’s products?
- What processes should I adapt?
- Can I adapt the context or target group?
- What can I adapt in this or that way in order to make this result?
Modify
- What can I magnify or make larger?
- What can I tone down or delete?
- Could I exaggerate or overstate buttons, colours, size…?
- Could I grow the target group?
- What can be made higher, bigger, or stronger?
- Can I increase its speed or frequency?
- Can I add extra features?
- How can I add extra value?
- What can you remove or make smaller, condensed, lower, shorter or lighter—or streamline, split up or understate?
- What can I change in this way or that way so as to achieve such and such a result?
Put to Another Use
- What else can it be used for?
- How would a child use it?—an older person?
- How would people with different disabilities use it?
- Which other target group could benefit from this product?
- What other kind of user would need or want my product?
- Who or what else may be able to use it?
- Can it be used by people other than those it was originally intended for?
- Are there new ways to use it in its current shape or form?
- Would there be other possible uses if I were to modify the product?
- How can I reuse something in a certain way by doing what to it?
Eliminate
- What can I remove without altering its function?
- Can I reduce time or components?
- What would happen if I removed a component or part of it?
- Can I reduce effort?
- Can I cut costs?
- How can I simplify it?
- What’s non-essential or unnecessary?
- Can I eliminate the rules?
- Can I make it smaller?
- Can I split my product into different parts?
- I can eliminate what by doing what?
Rearrange
- What can I rearrange in some way – can I interchange components, the pattern, or the layout?
- Can I change the pace or schedule?
- What would I do if part of your problem, product or process worked in reverse?
- I can rearrange what in what way such that this happens?
When I have to choose between two options
This is a very tricky situation, and we go through this phase all the time. Recently, I ran this template to make an important decision on locatio—Should I choose Bangalore or London for the time being? The template is simple enough that you can run this on your mind too.
- What are the constraints?
- What are the options?
- What is the decision? And why have I taken this decision?
When I’m facing a blank state
I sometimes feel like my ink is dry. There aren’t any new ideas worth writing about. In such periods while facing a blank state problem, I try to ask these questions to myself.
- What is inspiring me today?
- What did I learn this week?
- Is there any fun productivity hack?
- Some new skill you have learnt?
There is always something interesting enough for me to write about. This reframing sometimes helps me overcome my blank slate problem.
When I’m taking tough decisions
When taking crucial life decisions which are fuzzy, complex and circuitous, it just needs a bit more thought. Writing them down in this template helps formulate the thoughts better.
- When to use this template: When taking crucial life decisions which are fuzzy, complex and circuitous. When you make critical life decisions
- Time:
- Mental or Physical State:
- Situation or context:
- Problem statement of frame:
- Variables that govern the situation:
- Complications or complexities as you see them:
- Range of outcomes:
- Alternatives that were seriously considered and why they were not chosen?:
- What you expect to happen and the assigned probabilities to each outcome?:
- Outcome:
- Reflection (six months after the decision was made):
I sometime go back in time to critically reflect on these supposed ‘one-way door’ decisions to know if I had made the right calculated move. Decision logs are a fantastic way to improve in the art of decision making.
When I’m journalling
On a weekly basis (looking backward)
- What did you love?
- What did you lack?
- What did you long for?
- What did you learn?
On a weekly basis (looking forward)
- How could you efficiently drain your energy this week?
- How might you strip this week of spontaneity & surprise?
- How can you ensure no creative work gets done this week?
- What’s the biggest constraint on my output right now?
On a monthly basis (looking forward)
- What seems like play to you but work to others?
- What is the highest leverage activity you could execute this month?
- What are you optimising for in your life right now?
On a yearly basis (looking forward)
- What do I feel right now? (pretty hard question to answer)
- What do I need right now? (human needs like belonging, self-actualization, autonomy—or even basic physical needs like sleep, food, and hydration—being met?)
- What do I want from life in general? Is my current situation/role getting me closer to my ideal?
- Which constraints make me stick to the current situation/role/behavior/company/ person/? And do I give these constraints the power to hold me there or is it okay to challenge/push these constraints?
Whenever I’m pitching to an audience
Seth Godin’s pitching template:
- What did this person [in the audience] believe before we got here?
- What do I want them to believe after they see this?
When I’m editing a writing draft
- Has the rhythm been created?
- Have the sentences been linked seamlessly?
- Are there any pieces that needs to be eliminated to avoid confusion?
- Are there any colourful, vivid details?
- Have all the unnecessary details been removed?
When I want to know my workmate better
These are a medley of questions that I ask team members in order to learn more about them as well as understand how I can best support them. I typically go over these questions within the first few 1:1s.
- What is most important to you in life? (what are your personal priorities)
- What kind of person do you aspire to become?
- What are your career goals and aspirations?
- Are you satisfied with your current career position? Why or why not?
- How do you feel about your current career path and trajectory?
- What generally motivates you?
- What keeps you engaged and motivated at work?
- When have you felt the most inspired at work? Why?
- When did you produce your best work? What contributed to that?
- What are your unique qualities?
- What are your strengths?
- Which skills would you like to develop further?
- What have you enjoyed the most about your previous roles or companies?
- How would you describe your ideal position, and why?
- What do you need to be successful in your role?
- How would you describe your ideal work environment, and why?
- What worked well and what didn’t with your previous manager?
- What type of feedback do you prefer?
Subscribe to get future posts via email (or grab the RSS feed). 2-3 ideas every month across design and tech
2026
2025
- Legible and illegible tasks in organisations
- L2 Fat marker sketches
- Writing as moats for humans
- Beauty of second degree probes
- Read raw transcripts
- Boundary objects as the new prototypes
- One way door decisions
- Finished softwares should exist
- Essay Quality Ranker
- Export LLM conversations as snippets
- Flipping questions on its head
- Vibe writing maxims
- How I blog with Obsidian, Cloudflare, AstroJS, Github
- How I build greenfield apps with AI-assisted coding
- We have been scammed by the Gaussian distribution club
- Classify incentive problems into stag hunts, and prisoners dilemmas
- I was wrong about optimal stopping
- Thinking like a ship
- Hyperpersonalised N=1 learning
- New mediums for humans to complement superintelligence
- Maxims for AI assisted coding
- Personal Website Starter Kit
- Virtual bookshelves
- It's computational everything
- Public gardens, secret routes
- Git way of learning to code
- Kaomoji generator
- Style Transfer in AI writing
- Copy, Paste and Cite
- Understanding codebases without using code
- Vibe coding with Cursor
- Virtuoso Guide for Personal Memory Systems
- Writing in Future Past
- Publish Originally, Syndicate Elsewhere
- Poetic License of Design
- Idea in the shower, testing before breakfast
- Technology and regulation have a dance of ice and fire
- How I ship "stuff"
- Weekly TODO List on CLI
- Writing is thinking
- Song of Shapes, Words and Paths
- How do we absorb ideas better?
2024
- Read writers who operate
- Brew your ideas lazily
- Vibes
- Trees, Branches, Twigs and Leaves — Mental Models for Writing
- Compound Interest of Private Notes
- Conceptual Compression for LLMs
- Meta-analysis for contradictory research findings
- Beauty of Zettels
- Proof of work
- Gauging previous work of new joinees to the team
- Task management for product managers
- Stitching React and Rails together
- Exploring "smart connections" for note taking
- Deploying Home Cooked Apps with Rails
- Self Marketing
- Repetitive Copyprompting
- Questions to ask every decade
- Balancing work, time and focus
- Hyperlinks are like cashew nuts
- Brand treatments, Design Systems, Vibes
- How to spot human writing on the internet?
- Can a thought be an algorithm?
- Opportunity Harvesting
- How does AI affect UI?
- Everything is a prioritisation problem
- Now
- How I do product roasts
- The Modern Startup Stack
- In-person vision transmission
- How might we help children invent for social good?
- The meeting before the meeting
- Design that's so bad it's actually good
- Breaking the fourth wall of an interview
- Obsessing over personal websites
- Convert v0.dev React to Rails ViewComponents
- English is the hot new programming language
- Better way to think about conflicts
- The role of taste in building products
- World's most ancient public health problem
- Dear enterprises, we're tired of your subscriptions
- Products need not be user centered
- Pluginisation of Modern Software
- Let's make every work 'strategic'
- Making Nielsen's heuristics more digestible
- Startups are a fertile ground for risk taking
- Insights are not just a salad of facts
- Minimum Lovable Product
2023
- Methods are lifejackets not straight jackets
- How to arrive at on-brand colours?
- Minto principle for writing memos
- Importance of Why
- Quality Ideas Trump Execution
- How to hire a personal doctor
- Why I prefer indie softwares
- Use code only if no code fails
- Personal Observation Techniques
- Design is a confusing word
- A Primer to Service Design Blueprints
- Rapid Journey Prototyping
- Directory Structure Visualizer
- AI git commits
- Do's and Don'ts of User Research
- Design Manifesto
- Complex project management for product
2022
2020
- Future of Ageing with Mehdi Yacoubi
- Future of Equity with Ludovick Peters
- Future of Tacit knowledge with Celeste Volpi
- Future of Mental Health with Kavya Rao
- Future of Rural Innovation with Thabiso Blak Mashaba
- Future of unschooling with Che Vanni
- Future of work with Laetitia Vitaud
- How might we prevent acquired infections in hospitals?